I would choose Angelina over Jen. Even though I think Jen is way hotter, I think Angelina is the type of woman who loves rough sex and would let a guy throw it in her ass. I have a feeling that she would probably be insanely good in bed, manhandle the fuck out of me and do shit I've never even dreamed of. I view Jen as relationship material. Although I think Jen is incredibly hot, I just think that the sex would be pretty tame. With Angelina, it would be an experience and I also seem to be attracted to crazy bitches.
Angelina, all the way. I believe she is more attractive and far more interesting overall. She would go down on me in public while Jen would be nervous about me touching her. From interviews I've read, she could also carry a decent conversation about something other than Botox and that bitch that stole her man. Yeah, she's done some weird shit, but not for a while. I kind of think she may have done some of it for shock value and it worked. MMMM, tasty.
I had to go Angelina. She looks like she knows more dirty things to do to your body than Scootah and a Taiwanese hooker combined. Also, every time I look at Jenn, I just see Leno chin.
As attractive as Jen is, I have wanted Jolie since I first saw her in "Hackers". I watched that movie a bunch of times and don't really like it.
Angelina's hotter, no contest. Jennifer might be cute, but can't match Angelina Jolie in the hotness bit. Seems to be one of the more intelligent people in Hollywood, too. That and the ability to dress as Roger Rabbit for Halloween sells it for me.
For me, they're equally hot. Just in different ways. It would come down to the type of sex I was in the mood for, I guess. If I wanted drunken anything-goes-who-put-what-where wildcat sex, I'd go with Jolie. If I wanted sensual Sunday morning sunlight-streaming-through-the-blinds-while-Enya-plays-in-the-background sex, I'd go with Aniston. On a side note, I watched The Bounty Hunter the other night and I think Aniston owes me at least a blowjob for sitting through the whole thing.
"Attractiveness can transcend physicality." That's the key statement, and with that in mind, I chose Jennifer Aniston based upon several factors, some of which have been extrapolated upon with assumptions I have deemed in my head to be reasonable: Physical looks: Jenn- Perfect, girl-next-door body and proportions, from her head to her toes. She looks just as sexy in sweats as she does dressed up for a red carpet. Naturally tan skin, and I don't think I could ever wake up in the mood not to immediately fuck the shit out of her. Possibly before she's even awake. She wouldn't like it, but I would. Angelina- I just can't get past her lips. I'm sure they help her blow like a fucking turbo jet, but I don't care. They're not sexy, they're distracting. Yes, she has awesome tits. Yes, her ass is nice too. And I can appreciate a toned set of legs too. Still, between her Madonna arms, and balloon animal lips, I just couldn't do it. Advantage: Aniston. No. Fucking. Question. Perceived sexual ability: Jenn- Foreplay would be fun, and I think she'd be a solid lay. Nothing out of the ordinary, just good, consistent sex. Angelina- Ok, so I like to try new things (the wife unfortunately doesn't... that's a whole different story), and aside from any kind of fecal matter/blood play/absolutely weird shit like that, I'm game for trying anything once. I imagine Angelina not only is into some kink, I imagine she'd bring a lot of experience to the table. Advantage: If my assumptions are correct, Angelina. "Hang-out" qualities: Jenn - This is the chick you'd bring to a ball game, and she'd throw beers at the dude in Lebron's Heat jersey. Angelina - she'd stay at home and keep busy by spending my money on orphans in Africa. Fuck that Advantage: Aniston Weirdness: Jenn- She strikes me as being overly clingy, and not in a good way. I love that my wife is obsessed with me, as I am with her. I also love that she understands that too much obsession turns flat creepy. I am not sure Jenn understands this. Angelina- see: basically every relationship she has ever been in Advantage: I'm tempted to say neither, but if I had to pick I'd say Jenn because it is possible to turn a phone on silent. Mothering children: Jenn - how many does she have? Exactly. Angelina- how many does she have? Exactly. Advantage: How many do I want many years from now (at most: 2)? Exactly. Sense of humor: Question: How many African kids does it take to harvest my wife's diamond for her ring? Jenn would laugh, say I'm going to hell for that, and clear her conscience by reminding me it was certified as not being a blood diamond, and remind me again that I'm going to hell. Angelina would have me arrested. Advantage: Jenn Other baggage: Aging: Look, at a certain point in life, you are just happy if the insurance covers the meds to get your dick to stand up. And really, at that point, does it even matter? The pussy you are fucking looks less like meat curtains and more like burnt cabbage. The chick's tits are hanging so damn close to her ass that you can grab both at once. Who gives a flying fuck what she looks like? If she fucks, she's good enough. Advantage: viagra
This whole thing really boils down to how tight you like the pussy that you fuck to be. Unless John Mayer and Brad are swinging 9-irons Jen's prolly still got a decent looking vag, Jolie on the other hand after pushing out twins and having god knows how many dicks in there prolly has a nice set of curtains.
Angelina, no fucking contest. Though I am slightly biased, because one of the first times I ever masturbated I was watching Hackers and thinking of her. Obviously it left a big impression.
I hate that I probably sound like Durbanite here, but in light of 4/5 of the posts in the thread being simply about which broad you'd prefer to put a few pumps into (and I do realize we are a self-selecting group), I have a question: Can someone please explain to me why highest (relative) physical attractiveness automatically = hottest overall? It sounds absolutely retarded, if not rhetorical at first, but think about it for a second with something other than your dick: Would you rather be married to an absurdly attractive chick who likes to fuck frequently and indiscriminately, or someone who is still highly attractive (though agreeably less so than the other option), has a relatively higher standards as to her sexual past, and likes to fuck YOU every few days? My god, as long as Angelina's face was turned away from me I'd wake up every morning cumming in my pants at least 2/3 of the time alone. And I don't think there's anyone in this thread who'd disagree. But damn, if you ate oscar style filet mignon every day eventually eventually you'd start craving a happy meal.
I've never been keen on Jolie's looks (the lips, face, balloon-sized tits, etc.). Aniston's more my speed, but possibly a bit out of my age bracket (I'm 28 - I suspect she might be more comfortable with someone closer to her own age) and, most likely, wouldn't gel well with my hobbies (pc games and TV). Besides, realistically (I battle to think any other way), both would be bored of my fat, pale ass within a second. So, Chater got my vote.
I'm amazed that there is a poll about this, and even more surprised at the results. I've never understood what was supposed to be so attractive about Jennifer Aniston. She's good-looking, of course, but no more beautiful than a fifth of the girls in their 20s or 30s I see walking around LA County. That is, there is nothing special or unique/sensational about her beauty. This isn't a Claudia Cardinale, Pam Grier, or Ursula Andress; a mind-numbingly hot actress that is easily one of the most beautiful woman on the planet. Aniston just a moderately above average looking, relatively ordinary woman. The photo spreads Chater and others have posted look amazing, but that's because they're AIR BRUSHED. Anyone can look stunning that way. Meanwhile, Angelina Jolie, in her prime, was legitimately a superlative, unusual, and stunning beauty. Not only her face, but the body, too. No one has a clue what their personalities are like in real life, and based on the few interviews I have seen, they are both dumb as fucking rocks. So that's a complete non-factor. Thus, it's easily Angelina Jolie for me...although I would take someone like Anaki Noni Rose over both of them combined (three-some).
Jennifer Aniston is only mildly above Sarah Jessica Parker looks-wise for me (exaggerating, but still). And she has one of the most annoying voices known to man. Seriously, every time she opens her mouth I want to stick a sock in it. Angeline.
Aniston is top of her class, but in a lower division, while Jolie is in a higher class, but middle of the pack for it. I don't think there's a clear winner, and taste is obviously going to play a huge role here, but I'm definitely on Team Jen. At the end of the day I'd rather see Bama play the Gators than watch the Seahawks against the Bills.
I think sex with either of these women is best summed up by Kandi from Two and a Half Men. (Paraphrasing) "Sex with Jen is kinda like going on Space Mountain. It's a good ride, but there's never any real danger. With Angelina, it's like being in the back seat of a car driven by a really smart kangaroo. She may go up on the curb a couple times, but she'll get you there." I'll take Jen...I don't trust kangaroos.
I find it amusing that the pro-Jenn argument includes the statement that she isn't a whore. Are you that naive? She's a star in Hollywood. Methinks she rode at least 50 miles of dick just to get on "Friends". Yes. She's probably a slut. She's an emotionally damaged whore like the rest of them. The real question is whether or not she was a flat-out prostitute like some of them. At least Angelina's hot.
I find it interesting that every single female here voted for Angelina. Yet somehow, Jenn is winning. Oh, and yes, Angelina all the way. Oh yes.