This wouldn't change anything. Kentucky fans are blinded by their own over the top homerism. They think because they have the most championships because they won a bunch in the 40s and 50s, they are automatically qualified to look down their nose on everyone else. Tucker and UK fans would just respond by mocking any team that hasn't been #1 this year or say they have the best team anyways, we'll show it in March. I honestly read people saying that they only true legendary programs are UK, KU, and UNC. The posters were arguing that consistent success and championships are they only true factors so they disqualified UCLA, Indiana, Duke, and others because they had "down" periods. Its just ridiculous. The same fans argued that UCLA only has been good for a decade which is not legit cause Sam Gilbert "paid" all the players, as their current coach has had wins taken away at his 2 previous schools. Better luck arguing with a horse than any other resident of Lexington.