Not even getting all those women to pose naked? No nudity, but nsfw just to be on the safe side: NSFW I mean, now only if they'd actually show some nipple. And look! That's an awfully cute bunny.
Everybody that knows cats knows that even adult cats can be held that way, they just REALLY prefer not to. Call her what you want, I could give a fuck how hot she looks to you. Kardashian is still a useless, impossibly stupid load catching swamp hag. You could get the clap just by looking at one of her photos. Seriously, why the idol worship for this retarded dirtbag? Name one D-list celebrity in the last five years that hasn't been up in her guts. She fucked JOE FRANCIS for Christ's sake, do I need to go on? She should have her legs sewed together and be heavily sedated until she's seventy years old.
Everybody's overlooking a very important point. Its a cat so who the hell cares? If it was a dog I could see a reason to get upset.
Have you ever tried to hold or pick up a cat when they don't want to or don't like the way they're being held? You might as well try and give a buzzsaw a handshake. There's no way they could have gotten a still photo of that cat if it was not happy with the way it was being held. Well, not without several ounces of catnip and a bucket bong....
FOCUS: Well, either talk about this case specifically or the way PETA and other similar organizations go about benefiting their cause. There has been plenty said about this idiot broad with the phenomenal boob job. And she probably was wrong for holding a cat like that. Does it hurt the cat? No, probably not. Is she a dick for doing it in the first place? Yes, probably. How about the other organizations? PETA, Greenpeace, NRA, NAACP? (While, not similar groups, the only ones off the top of my head.) I'm sure that most of the big groups started off with the best of intentions. Now? Political monsters that influence everything.
Without showing preference one way or another, I have an honest question: What is y'all's impression of the whole Whale Wars/Sea Shepherd/Paul Watson thing? I saw a documentary on him that I thought was interesting.
Honestly, I MIGHT give more of a shit when I see one of those headlines if I knew the celeb was actually going to show some nudity. You give me Megan Fox spreading her pussy lips open with a bunny rabbit next to her and I might read more into it. Fuck that cock tease bullshit. Ingrid Newkirk the co founder of PETA I think is one of those people with a severe mental disorder that people around her let go because she was successful at pushing their cause. Sort of like Micheal Jackson.
My feeling is PETA cares more about animals than they do about humans, they are a special interest group who go way overboard to promote their causes, my feelings for the Sierra club are just as negative. While I am for caring for animals correctly and in a humane fashion I don't need some cunt city slicker bitch writing policy on how I raise my animals, nor do I need her worthless vitriolic commentary on hunting and fishing based completely on junk science and circular reasoning specifically designed to promote a bullshit non profit cause, that the whore who runs it profits from. Fuck you and your holier than thou agenda. Fortunately for me neither PETA or the cocksuckers from the sierra club come anywhere near my hunting or fishing grounds.
Self Edit: Thanks to some smart board members, I mis-represented the picture I posted earlier in this thread: that was Lyndon Baines Johnson, not Nixon. My excuse for that mistake is weak at best; message me if you want the rambling answer. Here is another picture to corroborate the previous post though:
No, PETA is the biggest full of shit organization there is. You think they care about animals? After the earthquake in Haiti the ASCPA's website had front page coverage to what their organization was doing to aid the pets of the victims of the earthquake, sent people down to Haiti to provide relief, as well as information for how people could donate to the mission. Guess what PETA had on their website about animals were victimized by the Haiti earthquake? Not a goddamn fucking thing. I even looked around on their website for any mention of it or anything they were doing in any similar vein to the ASPCA and couldn't find a single mention of it. Instead they were in the middle of protesting the use of a live groundhog for Groundhog Day and suggesting the use of a robot groundhog instead. So much for giving a shit about actual animals.
Ever tried to pick up a cat that didn't want to be picked up ? Grabbing them by the scruff of the neck and holding firmly is the only way to stop the little bastards from shredding your hands with their claws or worse still being bitten.
So I've given my pro-cat, anti-Peta spiel. Can we look at this for a second? I don't care what she does to animals. It's a gorgeous, skinny brunette, with big, nice tits, and a huge (but realistically rounded, and very pleasurable) ass, taking a picture with a kitty cat. Why did this ever become more than that? Women. Feminist, uber-animal women. No (straight) dude would have ever looked at that picture and thought, "there may be an issue here." How fucking hot is Kim K? Her personality, her family, her past, her choice in men... they are all abhorrent. But Sweet Fancy Jesus, would I like to bone her. And that even takes into account her sex-tape, where she mostly looks like a dead-fish fuck. I'd be ok with turning her over, and just enjoying who I'm fucking. She could lay there like she's dead, it'd still be hot for me.
True. I've worked in a Vet clinic and when you get a nasty cat, you have to get nasty back to treat it. The scruff is the only way to keep that cat from shredding your forearms, and cat scratches can take up to 5 years to vanish (no bullshit).
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.seashepherd.org/matilda/video.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.seashepherd.org/matilda/video.html</a> I love the show. Not because I agree with them, but for the near 3 Stooges type incompetencies to accomplish their goals. If I'm ever having a bad day, I watch the 4th and 5th videos down. Those were the moments when they decided to take their 5 million dollar maneuverable carbon fiber trimaran across the bow of an unmaneuverable frigate. The Japanese whaling boat cuts the bow off of this ultra expensive, new-fangled marvel. Takes any bad day and makes it a good one for me.
Absolutely. They are the biggest idiots on the planet, and incredibly enjoyable to watch. Watching them nearly kill people while trying to figure out how to launch one of their boats off the winch/crane is an exercise in "what could possibly go wrong?".
There was a cat in that photo? Is it like one of those 3D images, where you have to "relax your eyes" to see it?
PETA is completely stupid. I remember 10 years ago or so when a Randy Johnson pitch hit a bird. You see the pitch then a puff of feathers. If I remember correctly they sent Randy Johnson some threatening letters and such. Like it was his fault the bird flew in the line of his pitch.
I find this manner of cat-handling not only acceptable, but preferable. Risk of being scratched when dropping it in the pot of boiling water is greatly reduced.
Not to hammer home a point, but I hate PETA so, so, so, SO much. Useless hypocritical radical fuckwads. I hate that they are the most public face of veganism. No one will ever take us seriously as long as they keep missing the point. They seem to think any publicity is good publicity - no, people just laugh at you and roll their eyes. Not to mention the thousands (millions?) of animals they have needlessly euthanized over the year, as well as all the terrorism they have funded. Jerks. You're NOT HELPING. They have done some good things and raised awareness, and I agree with their moral stance on animal abuse, but I can't condone their behavior. It's ridiculous and embarrassing. As for Kimmy, well, I have fostered many kittens, and held many of them like that when they are being little shits (the black ones can be especially diabolical). If it's uncomfortable for them, they usually let you know right away. If she was only holding it for a few seconds, I don't have a problem with it, and I doubt the kitten does either. What bothers me is the smug look on Kimmy's face (yes, I noticed her face), that the kitten is a prop for her to pose with, an accessory. But apparently she "loves animals" so, I'm not going to get bent out of shape about it when there's plenty of other people who are actually abusing animals that need to be reprimanded. The idea that other people will now go out and abuse animals because they saw her holding a kitten by the scruff is laughable. Abusers abuse because they are damaged and I doubt you'll ever hear someone say "But Kim Kardashian did it, so it's okay" (except maybe Butters).