We've done "favourite positions" to death (literally and figuratively), but I can't remember if we've ever done LEAST favourite positions before. I'd look it up, but that sounds like work. Focus: What's your least favourite sexual position? Alt Focus: Any hard lines that you absolutely will not cross, no matter what?
Reverse cowgirl is highly overrated. Sometimes it works but in my experience it's usually just horribly awkward for everyone involved.
Handjobs. Ladies, your hands are not self-lubricating, and it is very easy to travel from "well I guess this is marginally better than jerking off" territory to "ow ow ow make it stop" land. You're also not 12 anymore. Other than that I haven't had a position than I'd say no to.
Focus: I agree with Ghetto on this one. A tugger is the absolute worst thing in the world. My penis is not a twist-grip throttle on a motorcycle so don't treat it like one. We're out of junior high so we can just pass on that part and get to the part where you put your mouth on my penis or let me place it inside of you. Alt. Focus: No fingers in my ass. I cannot tell you how many times ladies have wanted to do this to me. Go ahead and place your finger on my gooch and apply a little pressure. I'm cool with that but that thing better not go any lower than that.
I'd agree that there are no "bad" positions. There are some that I don't love because they get exhausting/painful after a bit, or that just don't provide enough stimulation for me. But none that I would say "nope not gonna happen" if proposed. I will say, the most hit or miss with variability for me is girl on top. Yea yea, the view is great, but its one of those positions where the girl has an ability to run the show...and alot of girls can't or don't know how. Its either rhythm-less bouncing or the scoot move that, while I know it provides direct clitoral stimulation, basically provides nothing for the guy at all so it can't go on long effectively. I mean, at least its a good workout when I have to thrust from the bottom. It's amazing how many girls are fantastic dancers and then can't translate that into rolling their hips well when it comes to sexual stuff. As for the other focus, I've yet to find a line I wouldn't cross. Obviously gay or bi stuff I'm not into, but otherwise I'm pretty much game for whatever and I'm usually the one who is getting stopped before a line is crossed.
It's okay for me to derail my own thread, right? How many guys would consider a MMF threesome? Would that constitute 'gay or bi,' even if swords never crossed and the two guys never touched each other sexually? It applies to ladies too, I guess. If you identify as heterosexual, is MFF crossing a line?
I strongly dislike being on top. I know a lot of girls love it, and it's certainly not a rhythm/getting my guy off problem--I think it's the first position I was able to get him off multiple times in the same session. I just can't concentrate on things feeling good when I'm on top. I get too preoccupied with making sure he's feeling good, that he's going to cum, etc. That's totally fine sometimes, but most of the time it's great for it to be good for both of us, and apparently i'm a shitty sexual multitasker. In response to DCC: I pretty strongly identify as hetero, but would happily participate in a FFM threesome, at least outside of my relationship (I'm not sure how great I am at sharing...?). Girls are pretty and soft and why not?
It would totally depend on the woman. Under normal circumstances I wouldn't be down with it - I'm a selfish person and expect no less than 100% undivided attention from my sex partner. However if there was some quid-pro-quo arrangement where she'd agree to an MFF with her and her hot friend but only if she got to have an MMF, I'd give it some consideration. Or if it was a hypothetical [female celebrity I want to fuck] was willing to throw down with me but only if her boyfriend/husband was involved I probably wouldn't say no to that.
I'm with JWags, and so are most of the women I've been with. I'll ask if she wants to be on top, and nine times out of ten, the answer I get is: "No, this is great!" I have been with a few women who were great on top, but they are few and far between in my experience.
I am good with whatever, just happy to be getting laid. The old lady prefers to be on top until she gets off once or twice then it's anything goes. She is an anomaly though, most other women I have been with preferred to be on the bottom, I'll second the rolling of the hips problem, doesn't seem to be that hard but what do I know.
I thought I was in the minority when it comes to ladies not liking being on top. It always seemed to be this consensus for women only being able to have an orgasm from being on top. But, I've always found it to be the position that feels the worst. It feels about as good as a speculum. So, since it's twice as much work and feels half as good, I'm generally not a fan. There is one version that I typically enjoy, and that's if he's sitting up and I'm in his lap. I think having my arms around his neck gives me better support to move around with ease. But, other than that, it's a no-go for me.
I'm less fond of being on top than any other position, but we still use that position from time to time. As for the MFM question, I don't know if I'd react too well to seeing my wife getting banged while she's blowing me, or blowing some other dude while I'm banging her. But then again, I might find it really hot. One thing for sure is, I'll never know.
I don't think I could do an MMF threesome. I often lose my erection while watching porn with cocks in it. Thus I believe seeing someone else's in real love while banging would produce similar results. She would just have to suck on a limp noodle.
Or, he would. I mean, I am not interested in a MMF, either. But, unless the option for him to do as much sucking as her is there, then it's not a threesome, is it? That would just be a girl with two guys doing her or her pleasuring two guys or whatever. To me "threesome" implies we're all getting all over each other, which is the way I prefer for a FMF to go down. I think if you're going to call it a threesome, that should be the case - otherwise, it's just two twosomes with one onesome doing double duty.
I personally don't much prefer having the girl on top. As others have said, the view is terrific, but I find it nearly impossible to finish. You just can't achieve the speed required to switch gears from fucking to finishing. Then again, I also have a hard time finishing from blowjobs so maybe I'm just weird. As far as MMF threesomes go, no way. I even find the prospect of an FFM threesome a little daunting. I just wouldn't know where to begin. Definitely nothing with my significant other. I'm way too protective for that.
MMF is interesting. I wouldn't do it cause I'm kind of selfish. I had a friend in college who was always suggesting at it. He'd have a girl we'd be talking to and if he sensed freak he'd be like "you wanna do it?" Never really got to anything. It would have been also extra odd as he is a 6'2 230lb black football player and I'm not. FFM doesn't intimidate me. I'd definitely be able to find a way. Multi-tasking is part of the challenge even if you're just with one girl. If a girl I wasn't in a relationship would throw down in a FFM but necessitated participating in a MMF as well. Eh, we'll see, as long as she wanted to do double anal.
I'm indifferent as to an MMF of the guys-aren't-going-at-each-other variety. That being said, it just seems unduly complicated, since you'd have to take into account what the other guy is doing. Seems like a lot of hassle for something I have no active interest in. I'm kinda surprised that guys dislike girl-on-top as much as they seem to, because I have the opposite experience of the other posters: I finish significantly faster/with less effort when the girl is on top. I've never been big on from behind. Somehow the angles never seem to be quite right and it involves a lot of readjustment and doesn't feel as nice.
For me, it'd have to be reverse cowgirl. With the girl on top normally I can still grab her hips and guide her, or wrap my arms around her lower back and have her grind against me, but with reverse cowgirl all I can really do is spank her and that's it. Although it's a useful position in an MMF. Besides, a fun thing to do when she's on top is to hold her tight with one arm, raise your hips, and flip her over using your free arm as leverage while staying inside her. That's not to say I don't like reverse cowgirl. It's still awesome. But it's like getting chocolate ice cream. I'll eat it, it's delicious, but I could be having Triple Caramel Chunk. As far as MMF threesomes go, as if the previous allusion didn't make it clear, I've done them and have enjoyed them. I think part of it is the fact that I have a voyeuristic streak, but it can be incredibly erotic. Plus the dynamic can change from "two guys here just to pleasure you" to "take care of both of us" and back and forth. MFF is obviously a lot of fun as well.
For me, the worst is reverse cowgirl. The Girlfriend has come close to snapping Yon Penis a few times in this position. I've had both kinds of threesomes and the MMF is not something I would repeat. It was awkward, because it just sort of happened and it was uncomfortable and literally impossible for me to finish. I only did it once, and it put me off from doing it again. The FFM threesome was a much better experience for all of the obvious reasons (my penis was the featured attraction), but also because the girls told me beforehand what they wanted and what was out of the question. One of my exes used to think that handjobs were just a hilarious thing to do, so I got them while driving, in class, in the library, etc. I never shot them down because half the time I could say, "I can't finish like this, try harder" and get a decent blowie out of it.
I've gotten partway into a MMF before shit got out of hand at the party and I had to bail in order to do damage control. It was hilarious and the girl was definitely a freak. There wasn't any interaction sexually between me and the other dude. Would I do it again? Probably, but only really for a story and not really for personal enjoyment.